Question · asked by 1 review

Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs Follow-up duration: Pulp necrosis

Population
Vital teeth
Intervention
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers)
Comparison
Follow-up duration
Outcome
Pulp necrosis

The pooled incidence with > 5–10 years of follow-up was 5.53%.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Indirect restorations vs Follow-up duration
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · > 5–10 years, > 5–10 years
The pooled incidence with > 5–10 years of follow-up was 5.53%.
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023) All outcomes
Proportion 5.53 [3.74, 7.64]2443 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations: a systematic review and…
2023 All outcomes
December 2022 (initial search October 2021, updated December 2022)68Not applicable

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.