Question · asked by 1 review

Test of placental function vs usual care: Elective delivery (induction of labour or non‐labour caesarean section) report of mode of delivery

Population
women in the third trimester of pregnancy
Intervention
Test of placental function
Comparison
usual care
Outcome
Elective delivery (induction of labour or non‐labour caesarean section) report of mode of delivery

Test of placental function showed no clear difference in elective delivery (induction of labour or non‐labour caesarean… compared with standard care (low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Test of placental function vs standard care
Elective delivery (induction of labour or non‐labour caesarean section) report of mode of delivery · women in the third trimester of pregnancy
Test of placental function showed no clear difference in elective delivery (induction of labour or non‐labour caesarean… compared with standard care (low certainty).
Use of biochemical tests of placental function for improving pregnancy outcome (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.98 [0.84, 1.14]2 studies · 740 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Use of biochemical tests of placental function for improving pregnancy outcome
2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.