Question · asked by 1 review

CBT plus standard care vs usual care: Global state: 2. Clinically important change (no improvement) ‐ long term

Population: patients with schizophrenia
Intervention: CBT plus standard care
Comparison: usual care
Outcome: Global state: 2. Clinically important change (no improvement) ‐ long term

It is very uncertain whether COMPARISON 1: CBT+ STANDARD CARE changes global state: 2. Clinically important change (no improvement) ‐ long… compared with STANDARD CARE ALONE (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only

Finding	Effect	Studies	GRADE certainty
COMPARISON 1: CBT+ STANDARD CARE vs STANDARD CARE ALONE Global state: 2. Clinically important change (no improvement) ‐ long term · people with schizophrenia It is very uncertain whether COMPARISON 1: CBT+ STANDARD CARE changes global state: 2. Clinically important change (no improvement) ‐ long… compared with STANDARD CARE ALONE (very low certainty). Cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care versus standard care for people with schizophrenia (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only	RR 0.57 [0.39, 0.84]	2 studies · 82 participants	Very low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

Review	Searched up to	Included studies	AMSTAR 2
Cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care versus standard care for people with schizophrenia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only	Not reported	Not extracted	Not assessed

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.