Cochrane · systematic review · CD007964
Cognitive behavioural therapy plus standard care versus standard care for people with schizophrenia
Jones, C, Hacker, D, Xia, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2018 · Cochrane Library
SchizophreniaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 71.4%Low 1 · 14.3%Moderate 1 · 14.3%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
COMPARISON 1: CBT+ STANDARD CARE compared to STANDARD CARE ALONE for people with schizophrenia
Population: people with schizophrenia
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Global state: 1a. Relapse ‐ long term COMPARISON 1: CBT+ STANDARD CARE vs STANDARD CARE ALONE | RR 0.78 [0.61, 1] | 13 studies · 1538 participants | Low Downgraded: inconsistency |
Global state: 2. Clinically important change (no improvement) ‐ long term COMPARISON 1: CBT+ STANDARD CARE vs STANDARD CARE ALONE | RR 0.57 [0.39, 0.84] | 2 studies · 82 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Mental state: General ‐ clinically important change (no improvement) ‐ long term COMPARISON 1: CBT+ STANDARD CARE vs STANDARD CARE ALONE | RR 0.81 [0.65, 1.02] | 5 studies · 501 participants | Very low Downgraded: inconsistency |
Adverse events: General: any adverse event COMPARISON 1: CBT+ STANDARD CARE vs STANDARD CARE ALONE | RR 0.44 [0.27, 0.72] | 2 studies · 146 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Functioning: Social (average endpoint score SOFAS, high = good) ‐ long term COMPARISON 1: CBT+ STANDARD CARE vs STANDARD CARE ALONE | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 295 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Quality of life: General (average endpoint score QLS, high = good) ‐ long term * COMPARISON 1: CBT+ STANDARD CARE vs STANDARD CARE ALONE | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 71 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |
Satisfaction with treatment: 1. Leaving the study early ‐ long term COMPARISON 1: CBT+ STANDARD CARE vs STANDARD CARE ALONE | RR 0.93 [0.77, 1.12] | 19 studies · 1945 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness |