Low socioeconomic status (>22.4% of the population) vs Not applicable: Dental caries
The unadjusted meta-regression coefficient for low socioeconomic status was 10.49365.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Low socioeconomic status (>22.4% of the population) vs Not applicable Mean DMFT · Adult participants in 25 meta-regression studies · Country-level study populations, Unadjusted model The unadjusted meta-regression coefficient for low socioeconomic status was 10.49365. Socioeconomic Factors and Caries in People between 19 and 60 Years of Age: An Update of a Systematic Review… (2018) All outcomes | Meta-regression coefficient 10.49365 | 7 studies | GRADE not reported |
Low socioeconomic status (>22.4% of the population) vs Not applicable Mean DMFT · Adult participants in 25 meta-regression studies · Country-level study populations, Model 2 adjusted The Model 2 adjusted meta-regression coefficient for low socioeconomic status was 10.35391. Socioeconomic Factors and Caries in People between 19 and 60 Years of Age: An Update of a Systematic Review… (2018) All outcomes | Meta-regression coefficient 10.35391 | 7 studies | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Socioeconomic Factors and Caries in People between 19 and 60 Years of Age: An Update of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of… 2018 All outcomes | March 2017 | 61 | Not applicable |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.