Question · asked by 1 review
Zygomatic implants without bone grafts (as a complete alternative to any bone augmentation procedure) vs Conventional dental implants in augmented maxillae: Prosthesis failure
- Population
- Participants with an atrophic maxilla who cannot be rehabilitated with conventional dental implants due to lack of bone (including patients subjected to cancer ablation surgery and irradiation therapy); partially or totally edentulous
- Intervention
- Zygomatic implants without bone grafts (as a complete alternative to any bone augmentation procedure)
- Comparison
- Conventional dental implants in augmented maxillae
- Outcome
- Prosthesis failure
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Zygomatic implants without bone grafts (as a complete alternative to any bone augmentation procedure) vs Conventional dental implants in augmented maxillae Prosthesis failure (prosthesis could not be placed or loss of prosthesis secondary to implant failure) · Participants with an atrophic maxilla who cannot be rehabilitated with conventional dental implants due to lack of… · At least 1 year in function The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in zygomatic bone for the rehabilitation of the… (2013) · Cochrane All outcomes | Summary of findings 'Zygomatic implants versus conventional implants'; Prosthesis failure: Assumed risk (conventional) Low risk population 10 per 1000, High risk population 100 per 1000; Corresponding risk (zygomatic)… | 0 studies | No studies found |
Zygomatic implants without bone grafts (as a complete alternative to any bone augmentation procedure) vs Conventional dental implants in augmented maxillae Prosthesis failure (prosthesis could not be placed or loss of prosthesis secondary to implant failure) · Patients with an atrophic maxilla that cannot be rehabilitated with conventional dental implants due to lack of bone… · At least 1 year follow-up The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in zygomatic bone for the rehabilitation of the… (2005) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD004151.PUB2, superseded | Results (Effects of interventions): no published or ongoing randomised controlled clinical trials or controlled clinical trials were identified. | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in zygomatic bone for the rehabilitation of the severely deficient edentulous… 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2013-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Zygomatic implants without bone grafts (as a complete alternative to any bone augmentation procedure) vs Conventional dental implants with bone grafts or other procedures for bone augmentation such as guided bone regeneration (GBR) · Patients with a maxilla that cannot be rehabilitated with conventional dental implants… · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.