Question · asked by 0 reviews
Zygomatic implants without bone grafts (as a complete alternative to any bone augmentation procedure) vs Conventional dental implants with bone grafts or other procedures for bone augmentation such as guided bone regeneration (GBR): Prosthesis failure
- Population
- Patients with a maxilla that cannot be rehabilitated with conventional dental implants due to lack of bone (including patients subjected to cancer ablation surgery and irradiation therapy); partially or totally edentulous
- Intervention
- Zygomatic implants without bone grafts (as a complete alternative to any bone augmentation procedure)
- Comparison
- Conventional dental implants with bone grafts or other procedures for bone augmentation such as guided bone regeneration (GBR)
- Outcome
- Prosthesis failure
What each review found
Include earlier review versionsNo findings match. Try fewer words or remove a filter.
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Zygomatic implants without bone grafts (as a complete alternative to any bone augmentation procedure) vs Conventional dental implants in augmented maxillae · Participants with an atrophic maxilla who cannot be rehabilitated with conventional… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.