Question · asked by 1 review
CBT vs inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist): Quality of life
- Population
- People aged 12 years and over with painful TMD lasting 3 months or longer
- Intervention
- CBT
- Comparison
- inactive control (usual care care, attention control, waitlist)
- Outcome
- Quality of life
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) vs Usual care, waiting list or no treatment (control) Quality of life · People aged 12 years and over with painful TMD lasting 3 months or longer The review found no eligible studies for this question. Psychological therapies for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) (2022) · Cochrane All outcomes | This outcome was not measured for this comparison. | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychological therapies for temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) 2022 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2021-10 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- CBT vs alternative treatment · People aged 12 years and over with painful TMD lasting 3 months or longer · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.