Question · asked by 1 review
Sclerotherapy vs no intervention: Health‐related quality of life
- Population
- primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis
- Intervention
- Sclerotherapy
- Comparison
- no intervention
- Outcome
- Health‐related quality of life
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Sclerotherapy vs no intervention Health‐related quality of life · primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver disease or portal vein thrombosis The review found no eligible studies for this question. Sclerotherapy versus sham or no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in… (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sclerotherapy versus sham or no intervention for primary prophylaxis of oesophageal variceal bleeding in children with chronic liver… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.