Question · asked by 1 review
PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy (neck dissection only if no/incomplete response) vs Planned neck dissection before or after chemoradiotherapy: Total mortality
- Population
- Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer with nodal disease (stage N2 or N3)
- Intervention
- PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy (neck dissection only if no/incomplete response)
- Comparison
- Planned neck dissection before or after chemoradiotherapy
- Outcome
- Total mortality
PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy (neck dissection only if… showed no clear difference in total mortality compared with planned neck dissection before or after chemoradiotherapy (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 50%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy (neck dissection only if no/incomplete response) vs Planned neck dissection before or after chemoradiotherapy Total mortality · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer with nodal disease (stage N2 or N3) · 3 years PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy (neck dissection only if… showed no clear difference in total mortality compared with planned neck dissection before or after chemoradiotherapy (moderate certainty). Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment (2023) · Cochrane All outcomes | HR 0.92 [0.65, 1.31] | 1 study · 564 participants | Moderate |
PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy (neck dissection only if no/incomplete response) vs Planned neck dissection before or after chemoradiotherapy Total mortality · Adults with oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer with nodal disease (stage N2 or N3) · 2 years It is very uncertain whether PET-CT following chemoradiotherapy (neck dissection only if… changes total mortality compared with planned neck dissection before or after chemoradiotherapy (very low certainty). Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment (2018) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD006205.PUB4, superseded | HR 0.92 [0.65, 1.31] | 1 study · 564 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers: surgical treatment 2023 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2022-02 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.