ISBCS vs DSBCS: Proportion of participants with endophthalmitis
ISBCS showed no clear difference in endophthalmitis compared with DSBCS (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
ISBCS vs DSBCS Endophthalmitis · people with bilateral age‐related cataracts (RCTs) Immediate sequential bilateral surgery versus delayed sequential bilateral surgery for cataracts (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 1309 participants | Low |
ISBCS vs DSBCS Endophthalmitis · people with bilateral age‐related cataracts (NRSs) ISBCS showed no clear difference in endophthalmitis compared with DSBCS (low certainty). Immediate sequential bilateral surgery versus delayed sequential bilateral surgery for cataracts (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.97 [0.32, 12.16] | 7 studies · 570322 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate sequential bilateral surgery versus delayed sequential bilateral surgery for cataracts 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.