Exercise vs no exercise at longest available follow‐up: ICD, appropriate shock (
It is very uncertain whether exercise changes ICD, appropriate shock ( compared with no exercise at longest available follow‐up (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Exercise vs no exercise at longest available follow‐up ICD, appropriate shock ( · adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator It is very uncertain whether exercise changes ICD, appropriate shock ( compared with no exercise at longest available follow‐up (very low certainty). Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.28 [0.05, 1.65] | 4 studies · 384 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.