Question · asked by 1 review

One-step adhesive bonding system (GC Ortho Connect) vs Conventional multi-step adhesive systems (three-step Transbond XT; self-etch primer Transbond Plus): White spot lesion development (QLF: mineral loss, lesion area/depth, new lesions)

Population
Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic (fixed appliance) treatment (adolescents and adults, ages 12 to 35)
Intervention
One-step adhesive bonding system (GC Ortho Connect)
Comparison
Conventional multi-step adhesive systems (three-step Transbond XT; self-etch primer Transbond Plus)
Outcome
White spot lesion development (QLF: mineral loss, lesion area/depth, new lesions)

A single RCT found the one-step adhesive without a primer (GC Ortho Connect) produced more and more severe white spot lesions than conventional multi-step systems (ungraded).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
One-step self-adhesive resin without a separate primer (GC Ortho Connect) vs Conventional multi-step adhesive systems (three-step Transbond XT; self-etch primer Transbond Plus)
White spot lesion development (QLF: mineral loss, lesion area/depth, new lesions) · Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic (fixed appliance) treatment (adolescents and adults, ages 12 to 35) · 2 and 4 months, Orthodontic clinical practice (in-vivo human clinical trials); adolescents and adults
A single RCT found the one-step adhesive without a primer (GC Ortho Connect) produced more and more severe white spot lesions than conventional multi-step systems (ungraded).
Can Orthodontic Adhesive Systems Inhibit the Formation and Development of White Spot Lesions During Fixed… (2024) All outcomes
Horan 2023 (1 three-arm RCT, 75 patients): the one-step adhesive without primer (GC Ortho Connect) had a significantly higher WSL incidence and larger, deeper lesions than both the three-step and self-etch systems…1 study · 75 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.