Primary study · included by 1 review
Comparison of three orthodontic bonding systems in white spot lesion development: a randomized clinical trial.
Horan et al. 2023 · Horan Ola G Abu, Al-Khateeb Susan N · The Angle orthodontist · 2023
Trial PICO
Not extracted yet. Trial-level population, intervention, comparator, outcomes and design will appear here after the trial extraction run. Until then, the reviews below describe the study.
Results
Not extracted yet. Per-trial results (events, means, effect and weight as each review's forest plot reports them) will appear here after the trial extraction run.
Included by
| Outcome this study informs | Pooled effect | Evidence | Certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Streptococcus mutans population TiO2-modified composite (1 wt.%) vs Control composite in contralateral quadrant · 1 to 6 months after bonding | No statistically significant difference between the S. mutans populations on the control and test sides at any time point. | 1 study · 40 participants | Ungraded |
White spot lesion development (QLF: mineral loss, lesion area/depth, new lesions) One-step self-adhesive resin without a separate primer (GC Ortho Connect) vs Conventional multi-step adhesive systems (three-step Transbond XT; self-etch primer Transbond Plus) · 2 and 4 months | Horan 2023 (1 three-arm RCT, 75 patients): the one-step adhesive without primer (GC Ortho Connect) had a significantly higher WSL incidence and larger, deeper lesions than both the three-step and self-etch systems… | 1 study · 75 participants | Ungraded |
1 including review in total.