Question · asked by 1 review
Planned early birth vs expectant management: Serious maternal morbidity or death
- Population
- women with prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks' gestation or later)
- Intervention
- Planned early birth
- Comparison
- expectant management
- Outcome
- Serious maternal morbidity or death
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Planned early birth vs expectant management Serious maternal morbidity or mortality (e.g. death, cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest, admission to intensive care unit) · women with prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks' gestation or later) Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37… (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 425 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more) 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.