Low molecular weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin: Success rate of replantation1 (analysed by participant)
It is very uncertain whether low molecular weight heparin changes success rate of replantation1 (analysed by participant, compared with unfractionated heparin (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Low molecular weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin Success rate of replantation1 (analysed by participant, · patients undergoing digital replantation after traumatic amputation It is very uncertain whether low molecular weight heparin changes success rate of replantation1 (analysed by participant, compared with unfractionated heparin (very low certainty). Low molecular weight heparin for prevention of microvascular occlusion in digital replantation (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.98 [0.87, 1.1] | 2 studies · 130 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low molecular weight heparin for prevention of microvascular occlusion in digital replantation 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.