FLUPHENAZINE DECANOATE vs ORAL NEUROLEPTICS: Global state: No clinically important change (as defined by the original studies)
It is very uncertain whether FLUPHENAZINE DECANOATE changes no clinically important global change compared with ORAL NEUROLEPTICS (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
FLUPHENAZINE DECANOATE vs ORAL NEUROLEPTICS No clinically important global change · patients with schizophrenia It is very uncertain whether FLUPHENAZINE DECANOATE changes no clinically important global change compared with ORAL NEUROLEPTICS (very low certainty). Fluphenazine decanoate (depot) and enanthate for schizophrenia (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.85 [0.56, 1.27] | 1 study · 102 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluphenazine decanoate (depot) and enanthate for schizophrenia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.