Question · asked by 1 review
Educational policy: mailed educational materials on prescribing for physicians vs an intervention to regulate drug reimbursement: Medicine use
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Educational policy: mailed educational materials on prescribing for physicians only vs an intervention to regulate drug reimbursement Medicine use · prescribers or patients that are subjected to educational or regulatory interventions in prescribing due to… Pharmaceutical policies: effects of educational or regulatory policies targeting prescribers (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pharmaceutical policies: effects of educational or regulatory policies targeting prescribers 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.