Should high‐volume haemofiltration vs standard or usual dialysis be used: 28‐Day mortality
Should high‐volume haemofiltration showed no clear difference in 28‐Day mortality compared with standard or usual dialysis be used (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Should high‐volume haemofiltration vs standard or usual dialysis be used 28‐Day mortality · patients with sepsis Should high‐volume haemofiltration showed no clear difference in 28‐Day mortality compared with standard or usual dialysis be used (low certainty). High‐volume haemofiltration for sepsis in adults (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.89 [0.6, 1.32] | 2 studies · 156 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| High‐volume haemofiltration for sepsis in adults 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.