Cochrane · systematic review · CD008075
High‐volume haemofiltration for sepsis in adults
Borthwick, EMJ, Hill, CJ, Rabindranath, KS, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library
Emergency and Critical CareAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
2
current version
GRADE rated
2
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Should high‐volume haemofiltration vs standard or usual dialysis be used for sepsis?
Population: patients with sepsis
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
ICU mortality Should high‐volume haemofiltration vs standard or usual dialysis be used | RR 0.59 [0.19, 1.59] | 1 study · 19 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency |
28‐Day mortality Should high‐volume haemofiltration vs standard or usual dialysis be used | RR 0.89 [0.6, 1.32] | 2 studies · 156 participants | Low Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency |