Pre‐hospital vs in‐hospital thrombolysis: Allergic adverse events
Pre‐hospital showed no clear difference in adverse effects ‐ allergic reaction compared with in‐hospital thrombolysis (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Pre‐hospital vs in‐hospital thrombolysis Adverse effects ‐ allergic reaction · participants with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction Pre‐hospital showed no clear difference in adverse effects ‐ allergic reaction compared with in‐hospital thrombolysis (low certainty). Pre‐hospital versus in‐hospital thrombolysis for ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0 [0.19, 77.03] | 1 study · 100 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre‐hospital versus in‐hospital thrombolysis for ST‐elevation myocardial infarction 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.