Female sex vs Male sex: Dental caries
- Population
- Individuals in East Africa assessed for dental caries
- Intervention
- Female sex
- Comparison
- Male sex
- Outcome
- Dental caries
Females had significantly higher odds of dental caries than males (OR 1.333, 95% CI 1.129 to 1.575); certainty not graded.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Female sex vs Male sex Dental caries (presence) · Individuals in East Africa assessed for dental caries · Community- and school-based populations, East Africa Females had significantly higher odds of dental caries than males (OR 1.333, 95% CI 1.129 to 1.575); certainty not graded. Prevalence of Dental Caries and Associated Factors in East Africa, 2000-2020: Systematic Review and… (2021) All outcomes | OR 1.333 [1.129, 1.575] | 12 studies · 5391 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence of Dental Caries and Associated Factors in East Africa, 2000-2020: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2021 All outcomes | December 2020 | 88 | Not applicable |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Female sex vs Male sex · School children aged 11-17 years in Sharjah · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.