Question · asked by 1 review

Liquid paraffin (mineral oil) vs lactulose: Frequency of defecation (mean number of bowel movements per week)

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Liquid paraffin (mineral oil) vs lactulose
Frequency of defecation (mean number of bowel movements per week) · patients aged 0 to 18 years with a diagnosis of functional constipation
Osmotic and stimulant laxatives for the management of childhood constipation (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted2 studies · 287 participantsLow
Liquid paraffin (mineral oil) vs lactulose
Frequency of defecation (mean number of bowel movements per week) · patients aged 0 to 18 years with a diagnosis of functional constipation
Osmotic and stimulant laxatives for the management of childhood constipation (2012) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD009118.PUB2, superseded
no estimate extracted2 studies · 287 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Osmotic and stimulant laxatives for the management of childhood constipation
2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.