Question · asked by 0 reviews
Extraction of the primary maxillary canine vs Retained primary canine (no extraction): Incidence or prevalence of root resorption of the impacted canine and/or incisors and cyst formation
- Population
- Children with palatally displaced maxillary canines (at least 80% of participants aged 10 to 13 years)
- Intervention
- Extraction of the primary maxillary canine
- Comparison
- Retained primary canine (no extraction)
- Outcome
- Incidence or prevalence of root resorption of the impacted canine and/or incisors and cyst formation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Extraction of the primary maxillary canine vs Retained primary canine (no extraction) Incidence or prevalence of root resorption of the impacted canine and/or incisors and cyst formation · Children with palatally displaced maxillary canines (at least 80% of participants aged 10 to 13 years) · At least 6 months follow-up after the intervention The review found no eligible studies for this question. Extraction of primary (baby) teeth for unerupted palatally displaced permanent canine teeth in children (2009) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD004621.PUB2, superseded | no estimate extracted | 0 studies | No studies found |
Extraction of the primary maxillary canine vs Retained primary canine (no extraction) Incidence or prevalence of root resorption of the impacted canine and/or incisors and cyst formation · Children with palatally displaced maxillary canines (at least 80% of participants aged 10 to 13 years) · At least 6 months follow-up after the intervention The review found no eligible studies for this question. Extraction of primary (baby) teeth for unerupted palatally displaced permanent canine teeth in children (2004) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD004621, superseded | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extraction of primary (baby) teeth for unerupted palatally displaced permanent canine teeth in children 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2012-04 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Extraction of the primary maxillary canine vs no intervention · Children with palatally displaced maxillary canines (at least 80% aged 10 to 13 years);… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.