Question · asked by 1 review
Extraction of the primary maxillary canine vs no intervention: Incidence or prevalence of root resorption of the impacted canine and/or incisors and cyst formation
- Population
- Children with palatally displaced maxillary canines (at least 80% aged 10 to 13 years); trials with craniofacial syndromes or anomalies excluded
- Intervention
- Extraction of the primary maxillary canine
- Comparison
- no intervention
- Outcome
- Incidence or prevalence of root resorption of the impacted canine and/or incisors and cyst formation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Extraction of the primary maxillary canine vs Untreated control (no treatment) Incidence or prevalence of root resorption of the impacted canine and/or incisors and cyst formation · Children with palatally displaced maxillary canines (at least 80% aged 10 to 13 years); trials with craniofacial… · At least 6 months follow-up after the intervention The review found no eligible studies for this question. Extraction of primary (baby) teeth for unerupted palatally displaced permanent canine teeth in children (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes | Root resorption of the impacted canine and/or incisors and cyst formation was not reported by either included trial. | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extraction of primary (baby) teeth for unerupted palatally displaced permanent canine teeth in children 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2012-04 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Extraction of the primary maxillary canine vs Retained primary canine (no extraction) · Children with palatally displaced maxillary canines (at least 80% of participants aged… · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.