High initial concentration vs low initial concentration: Bradycardia
High initial concentration showed no clear difference in bradycardia compared with low initial concentration (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
High initial concentration vs low initial concentration Bradycardia · patients with inhalational induction of anaesthesia High initial concentration showed no clear difference in bradycardia compared with low initial concentration (low certainty). High initial concentration versus low initial concentration sevoflurane for inhalational induction of… (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 0.8 [0.22, 2.88] | 3 studies · 199 participants | Low |
High initial concentration vs low initial concentration Bradycardia · Patients undergoing inhalational induction of anaesthesia High initial concentration versus low initial concentration sevoflurane for inhalational induction of… (2012) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD006837.PUB2, superseded | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 199 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| High initial concentration versus low initial concentration sevoflurane for inhalational induction of anaesthesia 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.