Cochrane · systematic review · CD006837
High initial concentration versus low initial concentration sevoflurane for inhalational induction of anaesthesia
Boonmak, P, Boonmak, S, Pattanittum, P · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 7 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Current version onlyHigh initial concentration versus low initial concentration for inhalational induction of anaesthesia
Population: patients with inhalational induction of anaesthesia
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Time to loss of eyelash reflex High initial concentration vs low initial concentration | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 443 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Cough High initial concentration vs low initial concentration | OR 1.23 [0.53, 2.81] | 8 studies · 589 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Laryngospasm High initial concentration vs low initial concentration | OR 1.59 [0.16, 15.92] | 7 studies · 588 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Breath holding High initial concentration vs low initial concentration | OR 1.16 [0.47, 2.83] | 5 studies · 389 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Apneoa High initial concentration vs low initial concentration | RR 3.14 [1.72, 5.7] | 2 studies · 160 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Patient movement High initial concentration vs low initial concentration | RR 1.14 [0.69, 1.89] | 5 studies · 445 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Bradycardia High initial concentration vs low initial concentration | OR 0.8 [0.22, 2.88] | 3 studies · 199 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
High initial concentration versus low initial concentration for inhalational induction of anaesthesia
Population: Patients undergoing inhalational induction of anaesthesia
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Failed gas induction High initial concentration vs low initial concentration | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 180 participants | Low |
Cough High initial concentration vs low initial concentration | no estimate extracted | 8 studies · 589 participants | Low |
Laryngospasm High initial concentration vs low initial concentration | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 488 participants | Low |
Breath holding High initial concentration vs low initial concentration | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 389 participants | Low |
Apneoa High initial concentration vs low initial concentration | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 47 participants | Low |
Patient movement High initial concentration vs low initial concentration | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 380 participants | Low |
Bradycardia High initial concentration vs low initial concentration | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 199 participants | Low |
Salivation High initial concentration vs low initial concentration | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 487 participants | Moderate |