Question · asked by 0 reviews

Routine scale and polish provided by a dentist vs No scheduled scale and polish treatment: Calculus

Population
Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial ages 14 to 77 years
Intervention
Routine scale and polish provided by a dentist
Comparison
No scheduled scale and polish treatment
Outcome
Calculus

Routine scale and polish led to higher calculus compared with no scale and polish (no treatment); GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Routine scale and polish vs No scale and polish (no treatment)
Calculus · Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial… · 22 months, with OHI subgroup
Routine scale and polish led to higher calculus compared with no scale and polish (no treatment); GRADE not reported.
Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults (2007) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD004625.PUB3, superseded
MD 0.77 [0.63, 0.91]1 studyGRADE not reported
Routine scale and polish vs No scale and polish (no treatment)
Calculus · Adults with fully erupted permanent dentition (periodontally healthy, gingivitis, or chronic periodontitis); trial… · 22 months, with OHI subgroup
Routine scale and polish led to higher calculus compared with no scale and polish (no treatment); GRADE not reported.
Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults (2005) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD004625.PUB2, superseded
MD 0.77 [0.63, 0.91]1 studyGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults
2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
2018-01-10Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.