Exercise vs no exercise: Anxiety/QoL Scale from: ‐1 to 1 with 1 indicating best outcome
It is very uncertain whether physical exercise changes anxiety/QoL Scale from: ‐1 to 1 with 1 indicating best outcome compared with no physical exercise (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Physical exercise vs no physical exercise Anxiety/QoL Scale from: ‐1 to 1 with 1 indicating best outcome · Adults with haematological malignancies It is very uncertain whether physical exercise changes anxiety/QoL Scale from: ‐1 to 1 with 1 indicating best outcome compared with no physical exercise (very low certainty). Aerobic physical exercise for adult patients with haematological malignancies (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | SMD 0.03 | 6 studies · 445 participants | Very low |
Physical exercise vs no physical exercise Anxiety/QoL Scale from: 0 to 1 with 1 indicating best outcome · Adults with haematological malignancies Physical exercise showed no clear difference in anxiety/QoL Scale from: 0 to 1 with 1 indicating best outcome compared with no physical exercise (low certainty). Aerobic physical exercise for adult patients with haematological malignancies (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD009075.PUB2, superseded | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 249 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aerobic physical exercise for adult patients with haematological malignancies 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.