Subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (SEPS) + saphenous surgery vs saphenous surgery: Recurrence of ulcers
It is very uncertain whether subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (SEPS) + saphenous… changes ulcer recurrence at 12 months compared with saphenous surgery (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (SEPS) + saphenous surgery vs saphenous surgery Ulcer recurrence at 12 months · participants with venous leg ulcers It is very uncertain whether subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (SEPS) + saphenous… changes ulcer recurrence at 12 months compared with saphenous surgery (very low certainty). Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) for treating venous leg ulcers (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.03 [0.15, 6.91] | 1 study · 75 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) for treating venous leg ulcers 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.