Question · asked by 1 review

Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) vs Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) with glass ionomer cement (GIC) or glass ionomer material: Caries arrestment at the individual (patient) level

Population
Children and adults with active dental caries (aged 1-50; mostly preschool/school children with primary dentition)
Intervention
Silver diamine fluoride (SDF)
Comparison
Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) with glass ionomer cement (GIC) or glass ionomer material
Outcome
Caries arrestment at the individual (patient) level

In one trial, SDF greatly increased individual-level caries arrestment versus ART/glass ionomer cement (OR 18.03); this subgroup was not separately GRADE-rated.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Silver diamine fluoride (SDF; 38% in most trials, 30% in three) vs Atraumatic restorative treatment / glass ionomer cement (ART/GIC)
Caries arrestment at the individual (patient) level · Children and adults with active dental caries (aged 1-50; mostly preschool/school children with primary dentition) · 3 weeks to 12 months, Children/adults with dental caries; multiple countries; community/clinic care setting not clearly specified, SDF vs ART(GIC)
In one trial, SDF greatly increased individual-level caries arrestment versus ART/glass ionomer cement (OR 18.03); this subgroup was not separately GRADE-rated.
The role of silver diamine fluoride as dental caries preventive and arresting agent: a systematic review and… (2024) All outcomes
OR 18.03 [7.34, 44.28]1 study · 234 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
The role of silver diamine fluoride as dental caries preventive and arresting agent: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
2024 All outcomes
Not specified (publication window 2014-2024; references accessed July 2024)20Critically Low / Critically Low

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.