Question · asked by 1 review
CCPT vs O‐PEP devices: QoL
- Population
- adults and children with cystic fibrosis
- Intervention
- CCPT
- Comparison
- O‐PEP devices
- Outcome
- QoL
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
CCPT vs O‐PEP devices QoL: change in CFQ score (across 12 domains) · children and adults with cystic fibrosis Conventional chest physiotherapy compared to other airway clearance techniques for cystic fibrosis (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 155 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional chest physiotherapy compared to other airway clearance techniques for cystic fibrosis 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- CCPT vs extrapulmonary mechanical percussion · adults and children with cystic fibrosis · 1 review
- CCPT vs exercise · children and young adults with CF · 1 review
- CCPT vs PEP · adults and children with cystic fibrosis · 1 review
- CCPT vs ACBT · adults and children with cystic fibrosis · 1 review
- CCPT vs AD · children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.