Question · asked by 1 review

Bruxism vs No bruxism: Oral health-related quality of life

Population
Indian children and adults
Intervention
Bruxism
Comparison
No bruxism
Outcome
Oral health-related quality of life

Two studies found bruxers have poorer OHRQoL than non-bruxers; narrative, ungraded.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Bruxism vs Individuals without bruxism (non-bruxers)
Oral health-related quality of life (continuous), measured by OHIP-14 · Indian children and adults · India; community-based and institutional settings across multiple states
Two studies found bruxers have poorer OHRQoL than non-bruxers; narrative, ungraded.
Impact of oral conditions on oral health-related quality of life among Indians- a systematic review and… (2023) All outcomes
Bruxism and QoL (continuous, OHIP-14): bruxers have poorer OHRQoL than non-bruxers (Thetakala 2018, Suguna 2020). Two studies, 284 individuals; not pooled.2 studies · 284 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Impact of oral conditions on oral health-related quality of life among Indians- a systematic review and Meta-analysis.
2023 All outcomes
Up to July 202241Not applicable

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.