RISPERIDONE vs QUETIAPINE: Adverse effects ‐ movement disorders
- Population
- psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation)
- Intervention
- RISPERIDONE
- Comparison
- QUETIAPINE
- Outcome
- Adverse effects ‐ movement disorders
It is very uncertain whether RISPERIDONE changes adverse effects: movement disorders over 24 hours compared with OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: c. QUETIAPINE (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
RISPERIDONE vs OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: c. QUETIAPINE Adverse effects: movement disorders over 24 hours · psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation) It is very uncertain whether RISPERIDONE changes adverse effects: movement disorders over 24 hours compared with OTHER ANTIPSYCHOTIC: c. QUETIAPINE (very low certainty). Risperidone for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation) (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.67 [0.46, 6.06] | 1 study · 40 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risperidone for psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation) 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- RISPERIDONE vs OLANZAPINE · psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation) · 1 review
- RISPERIDONE vs COMBINATION: a. RISPERIDONE + OXCARBAZEPINE · psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation) · 1 review
- RISPERIDONE vs COMBINATION: b. RISPERIDONE + VALPROIC ACID · psychosis‐induced aggression or agitation (rapid tranquillisation) · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.