Question · asked by 1 review
Intensification of prophylactic therapy guided by colonoscopy vs intensification guided by clinical recurrence: Quality of life
- Population
- adult participants (> 16 years of age) undergoing intestinal resection due to Crohn's disease
- Intervention
- Intensification of prophylactic therapy guided by colonoscopy
- Comparison
- intensification guided by clinical recurrence
- Outcome
- Quality of life
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Intensification of prophylactic therapy guided by colonoscopy vs intensification guided by clinical recurrence Quality of life · adult participants (> 16 years of age) undergoing intestinal resection due to Crohn's disease The review found no eligible studies for this question. Colonoscopy‐guided therapy for the prevention of post‐operative recurrence of Crohn’s disease (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colonoscopy‐guided therapy for the prevention of post‐operative recurrence of Crohn’s disease 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.