Question · asked by 1 review

Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) vs Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): Oral health-related quality of life

Population
Children with dental caries
Intervention
Silver diamine fluoride (SDF)
Comparison
Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)
Outcome
Oral health-related quality of life

SDF did not significantly differ from atraumatic restorative treatment for oral health-related quality of life (MD 0.02, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.36; ungraded).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) vs Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL; B-ECOHIS) · Children with dental caries (ages ~2-13 years in the pooled trials) · Post-treatment, Pediatric dental care; trials conducted in China, the USA, and Brazil
SDF did not significantly differ from atraumatic restorative treatment for oral health-related quality of life (MD 0.02, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.36; ungraded).
Silver diamine fluoride and oral health-related quality of life: A review and network meta-analysis. (2022) All outcomes
MD 0.02 [-0.32, 0.36]2 studies · 134 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Silver diamine fluoride and oral health-related quality of life: A review and network meta-analysis.
2022 All outcomes
30 July 202110Critically Low / Critically Low

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.