Prior application of silver diamine fluoride (SDF), with or without a rinsing step vs No prior SDF application (untreated dentin control): Immediate bond strength (MPa)
- Population
- Glass-ionomer cement bonded to dentin (in vitro), sound or caries-affected
- Intervention
- Prior application of silver diamine fluoride (SDF), with or without a rinsing step
- Comparison
- No prior SDF application (untreated dentin control)
- Outcome
- Immediate bond strength (MPa)
Prior SDF application does not influence the immediate bond strength of glass-ionomer cement to dentin (MD -0.11 MPa, 95% CI -0.54 to 0.31; ungraded).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Prior application of silver diamine fluoride (SDF), with or without a rinsing step vs No prior SDF application (untreated dentin control) Immediate bond strength (MPa) · Glass-ionomer cement bonded to dentin (in vitro), sound or caries-affected · Immediate bond strength, In vitro (laboratory bond-strength testing), Overall (all dentin conditions and rinsing protocols) Prior SDF application does not influence the immediate bond strength of glass-ionomer cement to dentin (MD -0.11 MPa, 95% CI -0.54 to 0.31; ungraded). Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Cement and Adhesives to Silver Diamine Fluoride-treated Dentin: An Updated… (2022) All outcomes | MD -0.11 [-0.54, 0.31] | 11 studies · 583 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Cement and Adhesives to Silver Diamine Fluoride-treated Dentin: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2022 All outcomes | Up to September 2020 | 34 | Critically Low / Critically Low |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Prior application of silver diamine fluoride (SDF), with or without a rinsing step vs No prior SDF application (untreated dentin control) · Dental adhesives/resin composite bonded to dentin (in vitro), sound or caries-affected · 1 review
Studies behind the findings
The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.
- Shear bond strength and interfacial analysis of high-viscosity glass ionomer cement bonded to dentin with protocols including silver… · 2020 · included by 1 of these review
- Influence of Silver Diamine Fluoride Treatment on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement to Sound and Carious Dentin · 2020 · included by 1 of these review
- Effect of three silver diamine fluoride application protocols on the microtensile bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement to… · 2020 · included by 1 of these review
- Shear Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement to Silver Diamine Fluoride-Treated Artificial Dentinal Caries. · 2020 · included by 1 of these review
- The effect of silver diamine fluoride and cleaning methods on bond strength of glass-ionomer cements to caries-affected dentin. · 2020 · included by 1 of these review
- Effect of silver diamine fluoride and potassium iodide on shear bond strength of glass ionomer cements to caries-affected dentine. · 2019 · included by 1 of these review
- Effect of silver diamine fluoride-potassium iodide and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate cavity cleansers on the bond strength and microleakage… · 2019 · included by 1 of these review
- Microtensile Bond Strength Between Glass Ionomer Cement and Silver Diamine Fluoride-Treated Carious Primary Dentin. · 2018 · included by 1 of these review
- The effect of silver fluoride and potassium iodide on the bond strength of auto cure glass ionomer cement to dentine · 2006 · included by 1 of these review
- Wang 2016 · included by 1 of these review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.