Question · asked by 1 review

Prior SDF application with a rinsing step vs No prior SDF application (untreated dentin control): Immediate bond strength (MPa)

Population
Dental adhesives bonded to caries-affected dentin (in vitro)
Intervention
Prior SDF application with a rinsing step
Comparison
No prior SDF application (untreated dentin control)
Outcome
Immediate bond strength (MPa)

Prior SDF followed by a rinsing step significantly increases adhesive bond strength to caries-affected dentin (MD -4.79 MPa favoring SDF, 95% CI -9.19 to -0.40; ungraded).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Prior SDF application with a rinsing step vs No prior SDF application (untreated dentin control)
Immediate bond strength (MPa) · Dental adhesives bonded to caries-affected dentin (in vitro) · Immediate bond strength, In vitro (laboratory bond-strength testing), Caries-affected dentin (with rinsing step)
Prior SDF followed by a rinsing step significantly increases adhesive bond strength to caries-affected dentin (MD -4.79 MPa favoring SDF, 95% CI -9.19 to -0.40; ungraded).
Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Cement and Adhesives to Silver Diamine Fluoride-treated Dentin: An Updated… (2022) All outcomes
MD -4.79 [-9.19, -0.40]3 studies · 72 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Bonding of Glass-Ionomer Cement and Adhesives to Silver Diamine Fluoride-treated Dentin: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
2022 All outcomes
Up to September 202034Critically Low / Critically Low

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.