Question · asked by 1 review

Resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish vs Sealants plus fluoride varnish (with or without restorations): Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions

Population
Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth)
Intervention
Resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish
Comparison
Sealants plus fluoride varnish (with or without restorations)
Outcome
Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions

Resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish may not differ from Sealant + 5% NaF varnish for arrest or reversal of occlusal carious lesions (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.21; low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish vs Sealant + 5% NaF varnish
Arrest or reversal of noncavitated occlusal carious lesions · Children and adults with noncavitated carious lesions on occlusal surfaces (primary and permanent teeth) · 8-12 mo, Dental practice (professionally applied or prescribed nonrestorative caries treatments; parallel and split-mouth RCTs)
Resin infiltration + 5% NaF varnish may not differ from Sealant + 5% NaF varnish for arrest or reversal of occlusal carious lesions (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.21; low certainty).
Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. (2019) All outcomes
RR 0.95 [0.75, 1.21]7 studies · 1575 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Nonrestorative Treatments for Caries: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
2019 All outcomes
June 201754Critically Low / Critically Low

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.