Test of placental function vs usual care: Small‐for‐gestational age
Test of placental function showed no clear difference in small‐for‐gestational age (below 10th centile on customised… compared with standard care (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Test of placental function vs standard care Small‐for‐gestational age (below 10th centile on customised birthweight chart or as defined by trialists) birthweight centile chart · women in the third trimester of pregnancy Test of placental function showed no clear difference in small‐for‐gestational age (below 10th centile on customised… compared with standard care (low certainty). Use of biochemical tests of placental function for improving pregnancy outcome (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.44 [0.16, 1.19] | 1 study · 118 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use of biochemical tests of placental function for improving pregnancy outcome 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.