Question · asked by 1 review

Telephone reminder vs no telephone reminder: Number recruited

Telephone reminder leads to higher number recruited compared with no telephone reminder (high certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Telephone reminder vs no telephone reminder
Number recruited · individuals eligible for a trial
Telephone reminder leads to higher number recruited compared with no telephone reminder (high certainty).
Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.9 [1.35, 2.67]2 studies · 978 participantsHigh
Telephone reminder vs no telephone reminder
Number recruited · Individuals eligible for a trial
Telephone reminder probably leads to higher number recruited compared with no telephone reminder (moderate certainty).
Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials (2010) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version MR000013.PUB5, superseded
OR 1.95 [1.04, 3.66]2 studies · 778 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials
2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.