Question · asked by 1 review

CPP-ACP enamel pre-treatment for prevention of white spot lesions before bonding metallic orthodontic brackets vs No enamel pre-treatment before bonding, or treatment with another material: Shear bond strength (SBS) of metallic orthodontic brackets

Population
Sound enamel of extracted permanent human teeth
Intervention
CPP-ACP enamel pre-treatment for prevention of white spot lesions before bonding metallic orthodontic brackets
Comparison
No enamel pre-treatment before bonding, or treatment with another material
Outcome
Shear bond strength (SBS) of metallic orthodontic brackets

When used to prevent white spot lesions on sound enamel, CPP-ACP pre-treatment did not significantly affect shear bond strength (MD 1.009, 95% CI -0.723 to 2.740; ungraded).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
CPP-ACP enamel pre-treatment for prevention of white spot lesions before bonding metallic orthodontic brackets vs No enamel pre-treatment before bonding, or treatment with another material
Shear bond strength (SBS) of metallic orthodontic brackets · Sound enamel of extracted permanent human teeth · Before bonding, In vitro (laboratory), Prevention of WSLs (sound enamel)
When used to prevent white spot lesions on sound enamel, CPP-ACP pre-treatment did not significantly affect shear bond strength (MD 1.009, 95% CI -0.723 to 2.740; ungraded).
Shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded to enamel pretreated with CPP-ACP: a systematic review and… (2023) All outcomes
MD 1.009 [-0.723, 2.740]7 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded to enamel pretreated with CPP-ACP: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro…
2023 All outcomes
29 March 2023 (from inception of each database to 29 March 2023)15Critically Low / Critically Low

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.