Question · asked by 1 review
Slow vs fast subcutaneous heparin injection: Bruise size 48 hours after injection (mm/mm2)
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Slow vs fast subcutaneous heparin injection Bruise size ‐ 48 hours after injection (mm/mm2) · patients treated with subcutaneous heparin injections Slow versus fast subcutaneous heparin injections for prevention of bruising and site pain intensity (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 5 studies · 503 participants | Very low |
Slow vs fast subcutaneous heparin injection Bruise size 48 hours after injection (mm/mm2) · patients treated with subcutaneous heparin injections Slow versus fast subcutaneous heparin injections for prevention of bruising and site pain intensity (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD008077.PUB4, superseded | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 459 participants | Low |
Slow vs fast subcutaneous heparin injection Bruise size 48 hours after injection (mm/mm2) · patients treated with subcutaneous heparin injections Slow versus fast subcutaneous heparin injections for prevention of bruising and site pain intensity (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD008077.PUB5, superseded | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 459 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Slow versus fast subcutaneous heparin injections for prevention of bruising and site pain intensity 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.