Question · asked by 1 review
Antibiotics vs antibiotics alone: Neonatal sepsis
- Population
- women in labor with management of intra‐amniotic infection
- Intervention
- Antibiotics
- Comparison
- antibiotics alone
- Outcome
- Neonatal sepsis
Antibiotics showed no clear difference in neonatal sepsis compared with antibiotics (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Antibiotics vs antibiotics Neonatal sepsis · women in labor with management of intra‐amniotic infection Antibiotics showed no clear difference in neonatal sepsis compared with antibiotics (low certainty). Antibiotic regimens for management of intra‐amniotic infection (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.07 [0.4, 2.86] | 2 studies · 163 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antibiotic regimens for management of intra‐amniotic infection 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Antibiotics vs placebo · Women with meconium‐stained amniotic fluid in labour, gestational age more than 24 weeks · 1 review
- Antibiotics vs no treatment during postpartum period · women with management of intra‐amniotic infection · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.