Question · asked by 1 review
Occlusal loading vs Non-occlusal loading: Marginal bone level change
- Population
- Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
- Intervention
- Occlusal loading
- Comparison
- Non-occlusal loading
- Outcome
- Marginal bone level change
Occlusal loading showed no clear difference in marginal bone level changes compared with non-occlusal loading; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Occlusal loading vs Non-occlusal loading Marginal bone level changes · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants · 1 year Occlusal loading showed no clear difference in marginal bone level changes compared with non-occlusal loading; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants (2013) · Cochrane All outcomes | MD 0.03 [-0.10, 0.15] | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Occlusal loading vs Non-occlusal loading Marginal bone level changes · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants · 1 year Occlusal loading showed no clear difference in marginal bone level changes compared with non-occlusal loading; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants (2009) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003878.PUB4, superseded | MD 0.01 [-0.13, 0.14] | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2012-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.