Question · asked by 1 review

Overweight/obesity (combined) vs Normal Weight or Non‐Obese: Dental caries prevalence

Population
Brazilian children under 5 years in primary dentition (BMI classified by WHO 2006 Z-score)
Intervention
Overweight/obesity (combined)
Comparison
Normal Weight or Non‐Obese
Outcome
Dental caries prevalence

The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of overweight/obesity on caries odds in the primary dentition (WHO 2006 Z-score; very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Overweight/obesity (combined) vs Normal weight (eutrophic)
Dental caries prevalence (any dmft), dichotomous · Brazilian children under 5 years in primary dentition (BMI classified by WHO 2006 Z-score) · Brazil
The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of overweight/obesity on caries odds in the primary dentition (WHO 2006 Z-score; very low certainty).
Overweight/obesity and dental caries in Brazilian children and adolescents: a systematic review and… (2024) All outcomes
OR 0.86 [0.60, 1.22]3 studiesVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Overweight/obesity and dental caries in Brazilian children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
2024 All outcomes
July 2023 (Methods); abstract states up to June 202251Not applicable

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.