Question · asked by 1 review

Comparison of plasma transfusions vs no plasma transfusions when the INR is 1.5 prior to central venous catheter insertion: Respiratory deterioration attributable to transfusion‐associated circulatory overload (TACO), transfusion‐related acute lung injury (TRALI) or transfusion‐associated dyspnoea (TAD)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Comparison of plasma transfusions vs no plasma transfusions when the INR is 1.5 prior to central venous catheter insertion
Respiratory deterioration attributable to transfusion‐associated circulatory overload (TACO), transfusion‐related acute lung injury (TRALI) or transfusion‐associated dyspnoea (TAD) · people with abnormal coagulation requiring a central venous catheter
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Plasma transfusions prior to insertion of central lines for people with abnormal coagulation (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extractedNot reportedNo studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Plasma transfusions prior to insertion of central lines for people with abnormal coagulation
2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.