Question · asked by 1 review
Chemotherapy (any regimen; added to, or compared with, locoregional treatment) vs Locoregional treatment and/or an alternative chemotherapy regimen: Quality of life
- Population
- People receiving curative-intent treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal (squamous cell) cancer
- Intervention
- Chemotherapy (any regimen; added to, or compared with, locoregional treatment)
- Comparison
- Locoregional treatment and/or an alternative chemotherapy regimen
- Outcome
- Quality of life
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 4 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Chemotherapy (any regimen; added to, or compared with, locoregional treatment) vs Locoregional treatment and/or an alternative chemotherapy regimen Quality of life · People receiving curative-intent treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal (squamous cell) cancer The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy (2021) · Cochrane All outcomes | Quality of life was a planned (protocol) outcome but no included trial provided usable quality-of-life data; the protocol was modified to report only survival/response outcomes. | 0 studies | No studies found |
Chemotherapy (any regimen; added to, or compared with, locoregional treatment) vs Locoregional treatment and/or an alternative chemotherapy regimen Quality of life · People receiving curative-intent treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal (squamous cell) cancer The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy (2011) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD006386.PUB3, superseded | Quality of life was a planned (protocol) outcome but no included trial provided usable quality-of-life data; the protocol was modified to report only survival/response outcomes. | 0 studies | No studies found |
Chemotherapy (any regimen; added to, or compared with, locoregional treatment) vs Locoregional treatment and/or an alternative chemotherapy regimen Quality of life · People receiving curative-intent treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal (squamous cell) cancer The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy (2010) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD006386.PUB2, superseded | Quality of life was a planned (protocol) outcome but no included trial provided usable quality-of-life data; the protocol was modified to report only survival/response outcomes. | 0 studies | No studies found |
Chemotherapy (any regimen; added to, or compared with, locoregional treatment) vs Locoregional treatment and/or an alternative chemotherapy regimen Quality of life · People receiving curative-intent treatment for oral cavity and oropharyngeal (squamous cell) cancer The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy (2007) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD006386, superseded | Protocol (Types of outcome measures, primary): Quality of life (using any appropriate scales, for example those produced by the University of Washington and the EORTC). Protocol; no included studies. | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2021-09 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.