Question · asked by 1 review

Volume‐targeted vs pressure‐limited ventilation: additional findings: Respiratory acidosis pH < 7.25 and pCO2 > 60 mmHg/8 kPa

Volume‐targeted showed no clear difference in respiratory acidosis pH < 7.25 and pCO2 > 60 mmHg/8 kPa compared with pressure‐limited ventilation: additional findings (low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Volume‐targeted vs pressure‐limited ventilation: additional findings
Respiratory acidosis pH < 7.25 and pCO2 > 60 mmHg/8 kPa · neonates up to 44 weeks' postmenstrual age
Volume‐targeted showed no clear difference in respiratory acidosis pH < 7.25 and pCO2 > 60 mmHg/8 kPa compared with pressure‐limited ventilation: additional findings (low certainty).
Volume‐targeted versus pressure‐limited ventilation in neonates (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.93 [0.51, 1.7]3 studies · 98 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Volume‐targeted versus pressure‐limited ventilation in neonates
2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.