Question · asked by 1 review
Immediate loading vs Conventional loading: Implant failure
- Population
- Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants
- Intervention
- Immediate loading
- Comparison
- Conventional loading
- Outcome
- Implant failure
Immediate loading showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 5 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Immediate loading vs Conventional loading Implant failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants · 1 year Immediate loading showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants (2013) · Cochrane All outcomes | RR 1.50 [0.60, 3.77] | 10 studies | GRADE not reported |
Immediate loading vs Conventional loading Implant failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants · 1 year Immediate loading showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants (2009) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003878.PUB4, superseded | RR 1.92 [0.70, 5.22] | 8 studies | GRADE not reported |
Immediate loading vs Conventional loading Implant failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants · 1 year Immediate loading showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants (2007) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003878.PUB3, superseded | RR 1.44 [0.38, 5.46] | 6 studies | GRADE not reported |
Immediate loading vs Conventional loading Implant failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form oral implants · 1 year Immediate loading showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants (2004) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003878.PUB2, superseded | RR 0.63 [0.09, 4.67] | 2 studies · 40 participants | GRADE not reported |
Immediate loading vs Conventional loading Implant failure · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form oral implants · 1 year Immediate loading led to lower implant failure compared with conventional loading; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants (2003) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD003878, superseded | One trial (Chiapasco 2001): one implant failed in each group; no statistically significant difference for implant failure; totals not selected. | 1 study · 20 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2012-06 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Immediate loading vs Early loading · Patients who are having osseointegrated root-form dental implants · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.